“We’ve all got some
unfinished business to attend to: The business of shaking things up,
and asking hard questions, and insisting on the hard truths. The
business of embracing those who struggle and making their struggles our
own. The business of refusing to settle for anything less than
what’s right and what’s fair and what’s just.” -Barack H. Obama
Well there is no way I can get around it. I am finally going to have
to deal directly with the ideas and ideology of presidential hopeful
Barack H. Obama. He titled his book “The Audacity Of Hope”
and make no mistake about it, he is an audacious man. However, a more
honest title might have been “The Audacity Of a Socialist,”
for everything he has said reeks of a true believer in pure,
unadulterated socialism. As the above statement indicates, he has no
problem with using the government as a tool for intervening and
interfering with the lives of American citizens. Always, of course, in
the name of doing “what’s right and what’s fair and what’s just.” Lets look at what this portends for us all…
“We meet at one of those defining
moments - a moment when our nation is at war, our economy is in
turmoil, and the American promise has been threatened once more.” -Barack H. Obama
Well if you are a socialist it is imperative that you generate a
crisis that needs immediate attention. Unfortunately for socialists
America truly is not in bad shape. Therefore they must construct an
illusion to try and motivate public perception to see
“turmoil” where there is none. The economy is always a
profitable place to hunt for grievances as there will always be some
people who feel they are not as well off as they would like to be. The
socialist must therefore create a sense of covetousness within our
society and then capitalize on the envy and inferiority that is
generated as many people feel that they have been
“disenfranchised” from something that has never belonged to
them.
EXODUS 2:17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house,
thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant,
nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his a**, nor any thing that is thy
neighbour’s.
Ahh yes, the tenth commandment. I will have to forgive many of you
for being unfamiliar with it since teaching such things is considered
undesirable in modern America’s socialist schools. Yet I cannot
help but feel that removing such moral instruction from the lives of
our citizens has proven quite useful in convincing so many that they
are worse off than they really are. The mortgage “crisis”
being a perfect example. In order to allow more people to
“participate in the American dream” laws were crafted to
reduce the qualifications for loaning money for home-buyers. This of
course leads to those once unqualified for such loans, to then fulfill
these initial suspicions by defaulting on their loans. According to
Barack Obama this is an economy in turmoil because close to a million
people are having trouble paying these mortgages. The American dream
therefore must be failing, and of course this is the fault of George W.
Bush.
Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, what he failed to mention was
the fact that during the Bush administration there have been 17 million
first time homebuyers. That means 95% of first time home-buyers under
the Bush administration are actually paying for their houses without
any complaint or government help. Combine that with the report that the
GDP grew by 3.3% from April through June, the highest growth rate in
the industrialized world for that period, and you are left with an
economy that just will not drop into a recession in spite of all the
attempts by the media to fabricate one through fear and misreporting of
facts. So much for an economy in turmoil and its subsequent threat to
the “American promise.” And as for that war the senator
referenced, we are winning it, in spite of Senator Obama’s proud
opposition to it.
“We measure progress by how many people can find a job
that pays the mortgage; whether you can put a little extra money away
at the end of each month so you can someday watch your child receive
her college diploma.” -Barack H. Obama
Here is a problem with socialists: They have to intrude into every
facet of your life. Why should government be concerned with your job,
your mortgage or your child"s college education. That is none of their
business. Already we see some of the fruits of this poisonous way of
thinking with the government passing a bill that will aid homeowners
who are defaulting on their loans. But what of the 95% of homeowners
who aren’t defaulting? Why should they have to subsidize others
who bought more house than they could afford. Why should we the
taxpayer have to be involved in financing the college educations of
children other than our own? This is Mr. Obama’s idea of “what’s right and what’s fair and what’s just?“
“Unlike John McCain, I will stop giving tax breaks to
corporations that ship jobs overseas, and I will start giving them to
companies that create good jobs right here in America.
I will cut taxes - cut taxes - for 95% of all working families. Because
in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on
the middle-class.” -Barack H. Obama
Good luck with that! I am starting to think that a college degree
from Harvard University is a bit over-rated. The economics department
obviously needs some work as Mr. Obama fails to understand that it is
the higher taxes that are CAUSING the jobs to be lost overseas.
According to figures from the CATO institute the United States has is
surpassed only by Japan for the highest tax rates in the developed free
world with a rate of 40%. This is AFTER the much maligned Bush tax
cuts. Ireland, whose economy is booming, has a corporate tax rate of
12.5%. They have been steadily lowering their tax rates and steadily
watching their economy grow.
If Mr. Obama is elected and insists on repealing the Bush tax cuts,
as he regularly claims that he will, that will make the United States
the country with the highest corporate taxes in the free world. What
does Mr. Obama think is causing corporations to move their jobs and
their money overseas? Rising unemployment is one element of the economy
that genuinely needs to be dealt with, but not by raising taxes on the
very corporations you need to create new jobs. If he wants to bring
jobs back to America and entice the creation of new ones he should be
cutting corprate taxes, but that doesn’t sound so well when you
are trolling for votes among the least productive elements of our
society. You must convince them that its and “us against
them” game and that the rules need to be changed.
There is good news for Mr. Obama on that front too! By raising taxes
on corporations and driving more of them to overseas markets there will
be fewer working families to receive the tax cuts that he is offering
them in exchange for their votes. Fewer working families will mean an
increased in the aggrieved classes who always vote for democrats, and
of course, fewer people to actually receive the phantom tax cuts he is
baiting them with.
Mr. Obama likes to say he will only raise taxes on those people
making over $250,000 a year. That sounds good until you understand that
almost everyone works for someone making that kind of money. They will
have to cut some expenses to pay the new taxes. Your job just may be
that expense.
“And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the
future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as President: in ten
years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle
East.”
“As President, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in
clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power.
I’ll help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient
cars of the future are built right here in America. I’ll make it
easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I’ll
invest 150 billion dollars over the next decade in affordable,
renewable sources of energy - wind power and solar power and the next
generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries
and five million new jobs that pay well and can’t ever be
outsourced.” -Barack H. Obama
My oh my aren’t we optimistic, and just a little bit
plagiaristic too. It seems that he is, in a somewhat half-hearted
manner, adopting John McCain’s energy plan. McCain has long since
been on record as calling for more production of U.S. resources.
However he had the courage to call for 45 new nuclear plants by 2030
and another 55 shortly thereafter. Now that is a commitment. He is also
calling for a streamlining of the process for obtaining liscenses and
permits to build them. This is generally the biggest obstacle in their
construction. Obama by contrast is speaking in generalities and
promising only lots of “restrictions” and
“regulations” that are sure to delay production.
One place Mr. Obama does not speak in general terms is in his call
for a whopping 150 BILLION dollars to subsidize new and unproven
potential sources of energy. It appears that when Mr. Obama sees oil he
is clearly aware that there is a finite reserve of those resources, but
when it comes to taxpayer funding Mr. Obama sees nothing but vast
untapped reserves. Unfortunately those reserves consist of yours and my
money. But in Mr. Obama’s world this is “what’s right and what’s fair and what’s just.”
“Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to
provide every child a world-class education, because it will take
nothing less to compete in the global economy. Michelle and I are only
here tonight because we were given a chance at an education. And I will
not settle for an America where some kids don’t have that chance.
I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an
army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more
support. And in exchange, I’ll ask for higher standards and more
accountability. And we will keep our promise to every young American -
if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make
sure you can afford a college education.” -Barack H. Obama
When did it become our “moral obligation to provide every child with a world class education?”
I always find it hard to tolerate a lecture on morality from a party
dedicated to the tolerance and perpetuation of every form of immorality
and decadence it can find. Is it the president’s job to invest
our money on recruiting an “army of new teachers?”
My constitution must be missing that part. It is especially distressing
to see that Mr. Obama believes that America owes every child a college
education. The colleges are filled with people who can’t read or
tell you what happened at Gettysburg thanks to government intervention
in the K-12 educational system. How does he feel they merit more
responsibility, and more money?
“Now is the time to help families with paid sick days and
better family leave, because nobody in America should have to choose
between keeping their jobs and caring for a sick child or ailing
parent.” -Barack H. Obama
That is some sweet sounding altruistic garbage. The government has
no right or authority to be dictating the day to day operation of
either a place of business or the family life of its citizens. This is
just another example of Mr. Obama’s complete acceptance of
socialist dogma. Freedom is entirely built upon the making of choices.
Remove them, and you will remove your freedom. You have a right to be
paid for work that you do. This policy is the equivalent of forcing
someone to pay you for not being at work at all. Is this “what’s right and what’s fair and what’s just?” You are not owed sick days or family leave from anyone.
“Now is the time to change our bankruptcy laws, so that
your pensions are protected ahead of CEO bonuses; and the time to
protect Social Security for future generations.” -Barack H. Obama
I guess its not enough to bail out a million homeowners who
defaulted on their loans, now the government must backup the pensions
of private businesses and regulate their behavior. Once again we see
Mr. Obama’s inclination to grow the government’s
responsibility and intrude on the operations of businesses. Between
increased regulation and increased taxes is it any wonder corporations
would seek to move their operations elsewhere. CEO bonuses, however
outlandish they may be, are private business and not a matter for
government.
Social Security is, of course, the flagship of socialism in America.
It was an illegal, unconstitutional program when Franklin Roosevelt
started it. Privatization, with an intention to move toward its
elimination, is the only solution to fixing this program. It has grown
to the point that it is unsustainable and everyone knows it. Yet it is
the immorality of the program that has always bothered me. Old and sick
people should be cared for by their families. Not by the government.
“Now is the time to finally keep the promise of
affordable, accessible health care for every single American. If you
have health care, my plan will lower your premiums. If you don’t,
you’ll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of
Congress give themselves. And as someone who watched my mother argue
with insurance companies while she lay in bed dying of cancer, I will
make certain those companies stop discriminating against those who are
sick and need care the most.” -Barack H. Obama
If Social Security has been the flagship of the great socialist
invasion fleet then Universal Health Care is the armor that is coming
ashore. Once again I ask: who promised “affordable, accessible health care for every single American?”
The government should not be in the health care business. If you think
health insurance companies are hard to deal with wait until you get
health care administered by the government. There will always be people
who lack in health care for one reason or another. Health care is one
of the choices that free people either choose to enter into or not.
Often their lack of ability to acquire health care is a result of other
choices they freely made beforehand. People who engage in high risk
behavior are going to be more expensive to care for and therefore cost
more to insure. That is simple enough that even a Harvard graduate
should understand it.
If you grant everyone the right to health care then the doctors
offices will be filled with people with marginal sicknesses and they
will prevent truly sick people from being able to get attention. That
is the natural consequnce of anything “free.” Rationing is
the next direct consequence of government health care in order to
address that situation. Rationing of health care services has occured
in every government health care system ever created. That makes the
government the distributor of health care. Think about that! How well
do you think they will do it? Do you really want to hand over all the
decision-making of your health in exchange for affordable or free
health care?
Once the government becomes the distributor of health care they will
be able to set the parameters for its operation. Did you know they then
can and will decide what you should eat? Why not? What you eat and how
you behave becomes EVERYONE’S business when the cost is bore by
everyone. Do you really want that much intrusion? Is that your idea of “what’s right and what’s fair and what’s just?”
The democratic party is an amalgamation of peoples and associations
that perceive themselves as having grievances with the United States.
The democratic party has always catered to these types but in recent
years it has thrown any semblance of responsibility to the wind in an
attempt to cater to these groups and try to build a voting coalition
that will get them back into power. They have always had a tendency
toward big government socialism. Which brings me to this famous quote:
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of
government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can
vote themselves money from the public treasure. From that moment on the
majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from
the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses
over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship.” -Alexander Tyler
Now we have reached that point where a presidential candidate has
opened up the treasury of his future administration to attempt to meet
the demands of these self-aggrieved people in exchange for their votes.
This is the entitlement culture. Those who believe that they have
rights and entitlements to things that do not and have never belonged
to them. I present to you, the messiah of the parasite class. A man who
dares demand something, nay everything, for nothing: Mr. Barack Hussein
Obama!
He is the entitlement culture’s version of Robin Hood. Like
Robin Hood he is charismatic. Also like Robin Hood, he is a theif. Just
because you organize yourself into a political party, vote yourself
into office and then redistribute the property and wealth of others who
have worked for it, does not alter the fact that you have taken that
which does not now nor has it ever belonged to you. Theft is theft no
matter the method. A moral society would not tolerate such behavior.
The day that those who do not produce can legally demand that those who
do produce must provide for their welfare, will be the last day of the
United States.
If elected president, Barack Obama looks likely to have a majority
in both houses of congress, and perhaps even a filibuster-proof senate.
The last day of the United States may be closer than you think. Those
who love their country, and all that it stands for, will be morally
bound to destroy it rather than see it succumb to the parasite classes.
That is always the natural end for parasites. They always kill their
host, which ultimately kills them. Perhaps we will learn from it and
build a better America the next time.
If you still persist in believing that an Obama presidency would be
a change for “what’s right and what’s fair and
what’s just, then consider the belittling that the messiah of the
parasites have displayed to their intended victims. This is how he
describes both John McCain and those who would vote for him:
“It’s not because John McCain doesn’t care. It’s because John McCain doesn’t get it.”
“For over two decades, he’s subscribed to that old,
discredited Republican philosophy - give more and more to those with
the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. In
Washington, they call this the Ownership Society, but what it really
means is - you’re on your own. Out of work? Tough luck. No health
care? The market will fix it. Born into poverty? Pull yourself up by
your own bootstraps - even if you don’t have boots. You’re
on your own.”
“Well it’s time for them to own their failure. It’s time for us to change America.” -Barack H. Obama
Failure!! How dare he call the very people, whose success he wishes
to pillage, failures. The prosperous and the producers in America are
not failures. The failures are socialist entitlement seekers who are
out to rob the successful by creating all sorts new of rights for
themselves and making demands for free health care, free college
educations, loan bailouts, bankruptcy protection etc. What they are in
effect demanding is freedom from the consequences of their own actions.
They fear freedom because freedom has both consequences and
responsibilities as well as rewards. The socialists see only the rewards
and make their criminal demands in the name of “Social
Justice,” or, as Barack Obama says “what’s right and what’s fair and what’s just.”
Do you really want this man and his cohorts to “change
America?” Moral people will not allow themselves to be made the
victims of their “social justice.”
In his convention speech Barack Obama also ridiculed a statement by former Texas Senator Phil Gramm in which he said:
“We have sort of become a nation of whiners. You just hear
this constant whining, complaining about a loss of competitiveness,
America in decline.”
Well, he’s almost right. America really hasn’t become a
nation of whiners. It has become a nation of housecats. The housecat is
a creature that likes to act as though it is independent and
doesn’t need anyone. Yet as soon as some difficulty presents
itself, the housecat will hiss and spit at the very people to whom it
is completely dependent for its existence. At the democratic convention
the housecats of America demanded free and universal everything as they
hissed and spit at the very people they need to provide them with it.
Perhaps the cats need to be put outside.
Meow!