Posted by
Sidney Allen Johnson on Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:09:55 PM
What is science? The method by which man tries to conceal his ignorance. It should not be so, but so it is. -Charles Hadden Spurgeon
The Climate Gate e-mails are shaking up the world of climate
“science” and, once and for all, placing the Global Warming
Cabal in the category of political extortionists. Unfortunately,
scientists themselves are going to find that betraying the
public’s trust will have huge consequences as their profession,
just as with educators, media and the government, is labeled as an
ideological hive of liars and thieves that will deliver whatever
“science” their benefactors demand.
Either computer hackers or a
whistle-blower obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails from the Climate
Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in England.
Those e-mails involved communication among and between many scientific
researchers and policy advocates with similar ideological positions all
across the world. They were openly and unashamedly discussing the
destruction and hiding of data that failed to support the position of
man-made global-warming.
For those of us who have known and stated that man-made global
warming is a hoax, this is merely a look behind the curtain of a
criminal enterprise to extract trillions of dollars from the wealthy
western industrialized countries under the guise of a “climate
debt” that is supposedly owed to the rest of the world. To the
socialist democrat, western society always owes a debt to somebody for
some wrong we capitalists have arrogantly committed in the pursuit of
free enterprise. Fortunately the United Nations stands ready to
redistribute this ill-gotten booty to its rightful
owners…themselves.
Right after the second world war a scheme was concocted to collect a
fabricated debt that the imperialist West theoretically owed to
its’ former colonies for exploiting local resources for their own
gain. The only problem with that scheme was that the greatest
repository of wealth happened to be the United States, which itself is
a former colony. It turned out to be difficult to make the richest
country in the world feel its’ proper share of “social
guilt” since it rose from the same conditions as the so called
“exploited colonies” to become the nation that just rescued
the entire world from the jaws of fascism. Unable to guilt us out of
our money, they had to come up with a new scheme.
Next, they decided that the West’s trading practices unfairly
victimized poorer countries. We owed a debt to these countries for the
human rights violations being perpetrated against their citizens in
manufacturing sweat shops that produce cheap products for western
consumption. Of course, with well paying manufacturing jobs vacating
the United States and the West for places like China, India and
Indonesia, the ole’ guilt factor once again failed to materialize.
So the arbiters of social justice had to brew another extortionist
scheme to siphon money from the West. I know, there’s a
population explosion going on and the world is heading for a new Ice
age. The lowering temperatures will reduce the amount of
available farmland so there will be no way to feed everyone. The rich
nations of the west will have to pay all the geniuses in the world to
fix the problem. It’s perfect…almost. Yea, you know what
happened next. It sure looked like the world was cooling down in 1975
but the world started warming up. Social justice foiled again.
As always, the teen-aged minds that make up liberalism, offended by
free people and unwilling to leave them alone, simply adapted a new
strategy. It was all too obvious. The world is getting warmer, so
consequently that must be the fault of…you know it…the
industrialized West. The bastards! We gotta make them pay the debt they
owe to the world. As always, the United Nations is there to encourage
and nurture social justice.
This time the scheme involved the idea that industrial emissions,
i.e. carbon dioxide, are trapping heat in the earth’s atmosphere
and, as a result, the cumulative effect of warm temperatures is
building to a crescendo of certain global ecological disaster. All
sorts of Playstations, (scientists would have us believe they used
computers) were programmed to project worldwide temperatures into the
future and, of course, they provided the results they were programmed
to provide. Ahh, science…you gotta love it. Of course the oceans
just wont co-operate as they seem to have risen exactly…not at
all! And of course the polar ice caps remain. Polar bears, we were
told, would be doomed by global warming yet their numbers have
increased five fold during the warm-up. It seems that for every global
warming lie, there is a corresponding “inconvenient truth”
to counter it.
Not the least of these truths is, of course, the fact that the earth
has not warmed any further since 1998. In fact, it has actually
significantly cooled. Ten years of stagnation, even as our
industrialized carbon emissions increased, was not part of the
projections. It’s a shame that the earth can’t be
programmed the same way as their global warming Playstations. What to
do? Well, change the name of the scheme of course! Now, instead of
“global warming,” they call it “climate
change.” This way they can claim EVERY weather variation to be
the fault of man-made emissions! Aren’t the godless a funny lot?
Worse still, is the intrusion of “actual” science into
the world of the climate change alarmists. Richard Lindzen of MIT, the
Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Planetary and Atmospheric Sciences, has
released a devastating study on climate feedbacks. Unlike the computer
projections of climate change alarmists, Lindzen’s study actually
has real and testable data that measures the escape of outgoing
radiation into space.
“We now know that the effect of CO2 on temperature is
small, we know why it is small, and we know that it is having very
little effect on the climate.”
The global surface temperature record, which we update and
publish every month, has shown no statistically-significant
“global warming” for almost 15 years.
Statistically-significant global cooling has now persisted for very
nearly eight years. Even a strong el Nino – expected in the
coming months – will be unlikely to reverse the cooling trend.
More significantly, the ARGO bathythermographs deployed
throughout the world’s oceans since 2003 show that the top 400
fathoms of the oceans, where it is agreed between all parties that at
least 80% of all heat caused by manmade “global warming”
must accumulate, have been cooling over the past six years. That now
prolonged ocean cooling is fatal to the “official” theory
that “global warming” will happen on anything other than a
minute scale. - SPPI Monthly CO2 Report: July 2009
Gee, he even talks like a real scientist, doesn’t he? Al Gore
and his fellow criminals claim that such radiation becomes trapped
within the earth’s atmosphere, leading to precipitous and
disastrous warming. Yet Lindzen’s study finds exactly the
opposite! Heat radiation has continued escaping out into space at rates
that would seem, finally, to put an end the global warming scare.
Results indicate, in fact, that the effects of CO2 on temperature over
the course of the next century will remain well below 2°degrees
Fahrenheit, possibly as low as 1°degree F. These projections amount
to less than one sixth of what the United Nations claims and are, quite
simply, negligible. This is the dagger through the heart that should
put this hoax to death.
For years we have been told that there is a scientific
“consensus” on man-made global warming and that the debate
about it is over. In fact, there never was a debate about it. This was
always a conclusion in search of evidence. Nothing more than the latest
grand scheme to extract money from western industrial countries and
redistribute it to the United Nations so they can socially engineer the
centralized world government of their dreams. To do this, THEY have
exploited the poor and underdeveloped nations of the world. In the
process they have lied, manipulated and destroyed data, and harassed
the careers of scientists that refused to follow their agenda. This is
perhaps the single biggest crime ever perpetrated against mankind. The
e-mails recently uncovered in the Climate Gate scandal reveal the
magnitude of the conspiracy.
The manipulation of evidence:
“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of
adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from
1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the
decline.”
Doubts about whether the world is actually heating up:
“The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of
warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The
CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows
there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our
observing system is inadequate.”
Suppression of evidence:
“Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re
AR4? Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment –
minor family crisis. Can you also email Gene and get him to do the
same? I don’t have his new email address. We will be getting
Caspar to do likewise.”
Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):
“…Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using
about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are
available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe
of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that
Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to
“contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we
don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that
far back…”
The least surprising excerpts refer to the excoriating and
dismissing of dissenters, and their plans to keep them from publishing
in reputable journals. It’s not surprising because these types of
accusations are commonplace in academia, and given the political nature
of the climate change debate and the federal money at stake, it was
only a matter of time before scientists succumbed to the temptation and
persuasion of delivering the science that the sources of their revenue
demanded. To do this they had to create a scientific climate in which
anyone who disagrees with man-made global warming would be written off
as simply a denier, whose views are dismissed as having no professional
relevance. To keep skeptics from publishing in a peer-review
journal…they simply take over the journal:
“So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop
considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate
peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in
the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers
in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or
request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the
editorial board…What do others think?” “I will be
emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do
with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome
editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of
editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He
has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past.
I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere.
Another thing to discuss in Nice !”
Does this sound familiar? Saul Alinsky would be proud. How many of
you would have thought the scientific community would be made up of
thugs and bullies? But alas, like the educational system and the media
before them, they have given up their professional pursuits in favor of
ideological purity. In this case, an allegiance to the social
engineering of a New World Order. In such a world such outmoded
concepts as “truth” and “freedom” are replaced
with the godless fantasies of teenage wisdom. But it still gets better
as this newly reported revelation shows:
Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted
throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their
predictions of global warming are based. It means that other academics
are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise
in temperature over the past 150 years.
The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to
reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of
Information legislation. The data were gathered from weather stations
around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the
way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the
originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped
to save space when the CRU moved to a new building. The admission
follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by
Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he discusses
thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data. -Times Online
Convenient how the original, unprocessed data that their projections
are derived from is destroyed isn’t it? That any responsible
government official would consider the economy strangling restrictions
being proposed as a response to global warming with such criminally
deficient science is childish on a Biblical scale! Scientists who value
their profession and their reputations should demand full congressional
investigations. The scientists who cast their lot with this
congregation of thieves should be made to do a “perp walk”
before the entire world.
President Obama is reacting to the e-mail scandal as expected. He is
ignoring it. He has changed his plans and now intends to go to
Copenhagen with a list of proposals and commitments. He is desperate
for a cap and trade agreement and is in way too deep to give up just
because of this scandal. General Electric is demanding a return on
their investment in his election, and Obama is obliged to comply. He is
bought and paid for. Like Nixon in the early stages of Watergate, he is
doubling down on his commitment to this scheme to submit the United
States to the control of restrictive United Nations emission mandates.
He still has the loyalty of the American media, who is doing its’
part to keep news of the e-mail scandal off the front pages of
newspapers.
On the positive side, however, Penn State University is
investigating one of its professors who is a leading proponent of
man-made global warming and whose name is all over these e-mails:
Professor Michael Mann is a highly regarded member of the Penn
State faculty conducting research on climate change. Professor
Mann’s research papers have been published in well respected
peer-reviewed scientific journals. In November 2005, Representative
Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) requested that the National Academy of
Sciences (NAS) convene a panel of independent experts to investigate
Professor Mann’s seminal 1999 reconstruction of the global
surface temperature over the past 1,000 years. The resulting 2006
report of the NAS panel concluded that Mann’s results were sound
and has been subsequently supported by an array of evidence that
includes additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions.
In recent days a lengthy file of emails has been made public.
Some of the questions raised through those emails may have been
addressed already by the NAS investigation but others may not have been
considered. The University is looking into this matter further,
following a well defined policy used in such cases. No public
discussion of the matter will occur while the University is reviewing
the concerns that have been raised.
Perhaps there is hope that this information will find its way out. It
certainly is destroying the credibility of global warming proponents
throughout the rest of the world where this is front page news.
President Obama’s own Science Czar, John Holdren, is prominently
featured in the scandalous e-mails. How long can the press keep a lid
on this? What we are talking about here is the small group of
scientists who have, for years, been the most influential in driving
world-wide alarm over global warming, not least through the role they
play at the heart of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change. The scientific establishment has been irreparably
compromised.
We now see everything coming into the open, the hidden hidden and
subtle things are in full, grotesque, view. The revealed lies of the
global warming alarmists are no different from the revealed lies of
evolution. The scientific community was willing to sell itself out to
a political ideology in return for professional enhancement and
government funding. Just as the lie of evolution was a stealth
destroyer of our educational system, so also is the global warming
scheme designed to capitalize on our mis-educated children’s
faith in a false science. We can only hope that everyone doesn’t
prove to be as stupid as their programming intended.
Science is not about consensus or diabolical political maneuvering.
It’s about data and the ability to reproduce results with that
data. Socialists, Democrats and other assorted liberals would have you
believe that they are strong proponents of science. The global warming
fraud is proof that this is not the case. Like God, science all too
often fails to deliver their desired results. Therefore they have to
fabricate a science that is more “useful” to them. For
those in pursuit of “social justice,” this passes for
morality.
The American liberal’s hatred for this country is limitless,
and they know they have but a short time to implement their schemes to
bankrupt us and hand over our sovereignty to the United Nation’s
nefarious global government. Even as both the scientific data and these
scandalous e-mails serve to destroy the global warming scheme in its
tracks, the President is off to Copenhagen to launch one last, ill
fated, charge. It kind of reminds me of the famous charge of George
Pickett’s division on July 3, 1863 at Gettysburg. The charge
succeeded in reaching its objective…they just couldn’t
hold it. They didn’t have enough support. The man-made global
warming scheme came so close, but in the end, it too will die for lack
of support.
Good news though! We are being told that there are “continent
size garbage dumps” being formed in the Pacific Ocean that are
certain to cause an ecological disaster. Obviously western
industrialized nations are to blame, and they must be forced to pay the
debt they owe to the rest of the world for polluting the oceans. The
United nations, with their hands out as always, will be there to
collect the debt. The dream of redistribution of wealth never dies.
Thieves, liars and liberals will always be with us, and our freedom and
independence just offends the hell out of them. They cannot leave us,
or our money, alone.